Kimberly-Clark vs. Coca-Cola: Which Dividend Stock Is the Better Buy Now?
Axe Cap view
Coca-Cola Tops Kimberly-Clark for Dividend Investors
Coca-Cola’s strong profitability and steady dividend growth make it a better bet than Kimberly-Clark despite KMB’s higher yield.
Kimberly-Clark’s nearly 5% yield looks tempting, especially with a low price-to-earnings ratio around 13x. But the underlying business struggles—sales have slipped slightly, and they’re heavily reliant on Walmart for a sixth of their revenue. Their stock has declined almost 20% in five years, signaling market unease. Plus, integrating Kenvue could be a distraction. Coca-Cola, on the other hand, shows what reliable dividend growth really looks like. With over 60 years of consecutive dividend hikes, strong profit margins north of 27%, and a 70% rally over five years, KO combines yield with solid growth. Its recent product innovation and steady revenue gains make it a classic defensive play that South African investors can appreciate, especially since the rand’s volatility often pressures local consumption stocks. The 64 years of dividend hikes demonstrate resilience through economic cycles, something KMB’s patchy performance can’t match. That said, regulatory challenges or unexpected currency swings could undermine Coca-Cola's edge. this is just our opinion and not financial advice
Buy Coca-Cola for a dependable dividend growth story with global resilience. Avoid Kimberly-Clark until clearer signs of strength or improved diversification emerge.
- KO
- KMB
- USD/ZAR
- integration risk from Kenvue for Kimberly-Clark
- currency volatility impacting Coca-Cola earnings
- regulatory pressure on beverage companies
7/10
The article compares two defensive dividend stocks: Kimberly-Clark and Coca-Cola. While Kimberly-Clark offers a higher dividend yield (4.78%) and lower valuation multiples, Coca-Cola is recommended as the better buy due to superior profitability (27.3% net margin), stronger stock price appreciation (70.2% over 5 years), and consistent dividend growth (64 consecutive years of increases). Both are Dividend Kings with reliable payout histories.
Our take is based on reporting first published by The Motley Fool.