Semiconductor Equipment Makers vs. Chip Designers: Who's Actually Winning the AI Cycle?

Axe Cap view

AI’s Semiconductor Winners: Equipment Makers or Chip Designers?

Chip designers show more pricing power than equipment makers despite the latter’s strong AI-driven demand.

South African investors often watch global tech trends through the prism of the rand and related sectors. The AI boom has split the semiconductor world into equipment makers like ASML and Applied Materials, and chip designers like Nvidia and Broadcom. Over the past year, equipment makers have seen massive share gains thanks to scaling factory upgrades, lifting revenue and earnings solidly. But chip designers boast far higher profit margins — north of 75% compared to about 50% for equipment makers — and better control over pricing, which is crucial if the AI spending surge cools sooner than expected. That means designers like Nvidia, with a dominant grip on the GPU market, hold a stronger long-term position. The Rand’s sensitivity to USD/ ZAR movements matters here; a stronger dollar supports the tech rally, but rand weakness could limit appetite for SA’s own tech-linked exporters like Naspers and Prosus. I’d lean towards the resilience of chip designers reflected indirectly through currency moves. Still, if the AI spending wave prolongs or capex targets are exceeded, equipment makers may surprise again. this is just our opinion and not financial advice